Current published reading edition · 2026-02-12
Admissibility Forces Hilbert Geometry and Schrodinger-Form Dynamics
Amos Jay Maley · 4 pages
This paper proves that Hilbert space geometry is a structural consequence of admissibility constraints applied to compositional predictive systems.
From the author's publisher description.
About this paper and citation
Amos Jay Maley. Admissibility Forces Hilbert Geometry and Schrodinger-Form Dynamics. 2026-02-12. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18620374.
SHA256 de073bd0123caa52f2b70c570fa6c0ef36c3f830892a8a5adf88885fffc366c9
These searchable PDF bytes match the exact publisher release. The PDF retains the equations, theorem numbering and references. A complete manuscript HTML conversion has not been verified.
Edition metadata
Work DOI record · Publisher metadata
Complete publisher description
Title: Admissibility Forces Hilbert Geometry
This paper proves that Hilbert space geometry is a structural consequence of admissibility constraints applied to compositional predictive systems.
Starting from minimal assumptions — continuity, ray-invariance, independent composition, Standing Conservation, and the exclusion of hidden carriers and free tunings — we show that any admissible standing-weight functional must be quadratic. This forces the parallelogram identity and, by the Jordan–von Neumann theorem, uniquely induces a complex inner product structure.
Formally:
Any continuous, ray-invariant, multiplicative standing-weight functional on a compositional predictive state space is necessarily quadratic and reconstructs a complex Hilbert geometry.
No Born rule, measurement postulates, ontic wavefunctions, Hamiltonians, or physical constants are assumed. The result is purely structural.
The paper closes a common foundational gap: it demonstrates that Hilbert space is not an arbitrary modeling choice but the unique admissible geometry compatible with compositional closure and standing conservation. Any non-Hilbert predictive geometry either introduces contextual carriers, requires free tunable structure (parameter illusion), or violates standing invariance.
This work provides the geometric substrate upon which subsequent dynamical results — such as the necessity of unitary evolution and Schrödinger-form dynamics — are derived.
Author description for the selected public release. Text formatting may differ from the publisher display. This is descriptive metadata, not a manuscript conversion or independent proof verification.
A preferred reading edition does not replace an exact edition imported by a downstream theorem.