Current published reading edition · 2026-05-11

A Classification Theorem for Physical Constants

Amos Jay Maley · 34 pages

Read paperDownload PDFDOI

A Classification Theorem for Physical Constants Admissibility-Fixed, Quotient-Dependent, Effective, Transport-Defined, and Presentation-Dependent Roles

From the author's publisher description.

About this paper and citation

Amos Jay Maley. A Classification Theorem for Physical Constants. 2026-05-11. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20118355.

SHA256 bbc1d8025bde7c7bfc29491a89261e0393231b293a5aa52bfa1b6b452bc53d5d

These searchable PDF bytes match the exact publisher release. The PDF retains the equations, theorem numbering and references. A complete manuscript HTML conversion has not been verified.

Edition metadata

Work DOI record · Publisher metadata

Complete publisher description
Static and Dynamic Uniqueness Arc — Paper II A Classification Theorem for Physical Constants Admissibility-Fixed, Quotient-Dependent, Effective, Transport-Defined, and Presentation-Dependent Roles By Amos Jay Maley This manuscript is the second paper in the Static and Dynamic Uniqueness Arc, a sequence of works analyzing admissibility-preserving uniqueness, invariant transport, standing-bearing continuation structure, and fixed-domain constraint architecture in physical theory construction. Building on the fixed-domain standing-fixity results established in Paper I, this paper develops a formal role-classification theorem for physical constants and constant-like quantities under admissibility-preserving comparison. The central result is a five-role exhaustion theorem: admissibility-fixed, quotient-dependent, effective, transport-defined, and presentation-dependent. The manuscript argues that these are not discretionary interpretive categories, but the complete admissibility-bearing loci available to constant-like quantities inside a fixed physical domain. The paper establishes that physical constants do not form a homogeneous parameter ontology merely because they appear numerically in equations. Instead, constant-like quantities perform structurally different admissibility roles depending on whether they function as: domain anchors, quotient invariants, effective envelope coefficients, lawful transport coordinates, or representational presentation structure. The manuscript develops: fixed admissibility domains, anchor/tensor/skin decomposition, role profiles, constant-continuation loci, family-level role discipline, transport-closure constraints, and target-domain retyping conditions for parameter families and ensemble comparisons. Detailed classifications are provided for: gauge groups and symmetry structure, dimensionful and dimensionless constants, gauge couplings, RG trajectories, fine-structure-constant structure, Yukawa matrices, CKM and PMNS transport structure, CP phases, EFT coefficients, Wilson coefficients, replicated sectors, and formal parameter scans. The paper further develops: a no homogeneous constant-space result, a role-before-explanation principle, a no default selector theorem for pre-admissible parameter spaces, and a formal error taxonomy for fine-tuning, anthropic, and multiverse role compression. The analysis remains explicitly compatible with: renormalization-group running, effective field theory, empirical parameter fitting, controlled parameter scans, beyond-Standard-Model construction, and ensemble modeling, while denying that formal parameter multiplicity automatically inherits standing-bearing explanatory authority. The central conclusion is that admissibility role classification is logically prior to variation, fine-tuning, anthropic conditioning, multiverse comparison, or explanation. Before a constant-like quantity can be meaningfully varied or explained, its admissibility role, comparison structure, continuation locus, and target domain must first be fixed. This paper is downstream of: Minimal Conditions for Admissible Construction  The Structure of Admissibility

Author description for the selected public release. Text formatting may differ from the publisher display. This is descriptive metadata, not a manuscript conversion or independent proof verification.

A preferred reading edition does not replace an exact edition imported by a downstream theorem.