Current published reading edition · 2026-02-08
Agency as a Bookkeeping Projection
Amos Jay Maley · 2 pages
This paper argues that agency is not an ontic primitive but a representational bookkeeping projection within an admissible interior. Under standing conservation and fail-closed admissibility, agency is shown to arise as a descriptive convenience tied to particular partitions of the admissible structure, rather than as an independently acting causal entity. The analysis proceeds by exhaustion: treating agency as ontically fundamental leads either to redundancy or to inadmissible scope transport. No mechanisms, decision procedures, or operational models of agency are proposed. The result reclassifies agency as a non-fundamental descriptive layer while preserving the closure of the underlying structure.
From the author's publisher description.
About this paper and citation
Amos Jay Maley. Agency as a Bookkeeping Projection. 2026-02-08. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18522151.
SHA256 f323bb029c04aa995ed3d6024a318bc824c48707b8aa4a43b0af509e76b167f3
These searchable PDF bytes match the exact publisher release. The PDF retains the equations, theorem numbering and references. A complete manuscript HTML conversion has not been verified.
Work DOI record · Publisher metadata
Complete publisher description
Author description for the selected public release. Text formatting may differ from the publisher display. This is descriptive metadata, not a manuscript conversion or independent proof verification.
A preferred reading edition does not replace an exact edition imported by a downstream theorem.