Current published reading edition · 2026-02-08

Agency as a Bookkeeping Projection

Amos Jay Maley · 2 pages

Read paperDownload PDFDOI

This paper argues that agency is not an ontic primitive but a representational bookkeeping projection within an admissible interior. Under standing conservation and fail-closed admissibility, agency is shown to arise as a descriptive convenience tied to particular partitions of the admissible structure, rather than as an independently acting causal entity. The analysis proceeds by exhaustion: treating agency as ontically fundamental leads either to redundancy or to inadmissible scope transport. No mechanisms, decision procedures, or operational models of agency are proposed. The result reclassifies agency as a non-fundamental descriptive layer while preserving the closure of the underlying structure.

From the author's publisher description.

About this paper and citation

Amos Jay Maley. Agency as a Bookkeeping Projection. 2026-02-08. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18522151.

SHA256 f323bb029c04aa995ed3d6024a318bc824c48707b8aa4a43b0af509e76b167f3

These searchable PDF bytes match the exact publisher release. The PDF retains the equations, theorem numbering and references. A complete manuscript HTML conversion has not been verified.

Edition metadata

Work DOI record · Publisher metadata

Complete publisher description
This paper argues that agency is not an ontic primitive but a representational bookkeeping projection within an admissible interior. Under standing conservation and fail-closed admissibility, agency is shown to arise as a descriptive convenience tied to particular partitions of the admissible structure, rather than as an independently acting causal entity. The analysis proceeds by exhaustion: treating agency as ontically fundamental leads either to redundancy or to inadmissible scope transport. No mechanisms, decision procedures, or operational models of agency are proposed. The result reclassifies agency as a non-fundamental descriptive layer while preserving the closure of the underlying structure.

Author description for the selected public release. Text formatting may differ from the publisher display. This is descriptive metadata, not a manuscript conversion or independent proof verification.

A preferred reading edition does not replace an exact edition imported by a downstream theorem.