Amos Jay Maley. Black Holes as Licensed Limit Regimes (Black Hole ARC 0). 2026-06-30. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21053625.
These searchable PDF bytes match the exact publisher release. The PDF retains the equations, theorem numbering and references. A complete manuscript HTML conversion has not been verified.
Complete publisher description
Overview
This manuscript is Paper 0 of the AASC Black-Hole Endpoint Arc. It serves as the orientation and role-classification paper for the series.
The paper treats black holes as licensed limit regimes under AASC, not as primitive ontological containers. Its purpose is to separate:
classical metric representatives;
exterior black-hole quotient structure;
admissible horizon reconstruction objects;
parameter ledgers;
thermodynamic ledgers;
information and reconstruction claims;
downstream quantum-gravity proposals.
Central Result
The paper establishes that black-hole claims must be typed by their role in a declared exterior reconstruction scope.
In particular:
mass, charge, and angular momentum are exterior response roles;
horizons are boundary structures inside a licensed metric projection;
singularities are metric-exhaustion diagnostics, not primitive admissibility boundaries;
entropy and thermodynamics are ledgers, not automatic ontology;
information claims require carriers, witnesses, encodings, and reconstruction maps;
holography, islands, remnants, fuzzballs, and final-state proposals are certificate candidates or richer-scope proposals, not automatic standing transport.
Exterior-Quotient Discipline
The proof-level object is not “stationary black hole” or “no-hair black hole.”
The operative object is the black-hole model’s declared exterior standing quotient.
In the familiar settled classical case, this quotient is represented by:
(Mext,qBH,Jext)(M_{\mathrm{ext}},q_{\mathrm{BH}},J_{\mathrm{ext}})(Mext,qBH,Jext)
but this is a standard exterior-parameter example, not a restriction on the theorem.
Hair-like, dynamical, evaporating, perturbative, ringdown, semiclassical, or quantum-corrected structures are treated by the same rule:
if they re-fix standing, they enter the exterior quotient or certificate package;
if they do not, they are skin, bookkeeping, hidden load, repair, selector import, or scope change.
Kernel and Formal Infrastructure
The manuscript introduces the AASC kernel as formal constraint infrastructure:
K=(Adm,Stand,Ref,Irr)K=(\mathrm{Adm},\mathrm{Stand},\mathrm{Ref},\mathrm{Irr})K=(Adm,Stand,Ref,Irr)
It explains what is lost if each component is denied:
denying admissibility destroys route licensing;
denying standing destroys same-content preservation;
denying reference destroys the threatened target;
denying irreversibility destroys the distinction between preservation and repair.
The paper imports the upstream Lean-formalized non-degenerate construction kernel as background infrastructure. It does not claim that this black-hole paper itself is a paper-specific Lean formalization.
Scope and Nonclaims
This paper does not claim to:
compute Hawking radiation;
solve black-hole microphysics;
replace general relativity;
deny classical black-hole solutions;
prove the capstone universe theorem;
prove a paper-specific Lean formalization of black-hole reconstruction.
Its role is to establish the black-hole target grammar used by the rest of the arc.
Role in the Arc
This paper exports:
the black-hole exterior quotient framework;
the role-classification discipline;
the kernel-deletion explanation;
the certificate vocabulary;
the distinction between exterior parameter standing and interior fact inventory.
It prepares the target for Paper I’s exterior no-totalization theorem.
This paper is downstream of:
Non-Degenerate Construction and the Kernel of Admissibility
The Structure of Admissibility
Author description for the selected public release. Text formatting may differ from the publisher display. This is descriptive metadata, not a manuscript conversion or independent proof verification.
A preferred reading edition does not replace an exact edition imported by a downstream theorem.