Standingless Interiors and Residual Coherence (Black Hole ARC 2)

Overview This manuscript is Paper II of the AASC Black-Hole Endpoint Arc. It develops the interior consequence of the exterior horizon obstruction. The paper begins after Paper I’s result: crossed standing is broken; old-scope standing transport is undefined; no leakage, certificate, non-sink quotient, or declared new governance is supplied. It asks: What is the status of the horizon-isolated carrier after standing transport fails? Central Result The horizon-isolated carrier is not an ordinary same-scope standing-bearing physical interior. It is a standingless residual-coherence carrier. The paper’s core distinction is: StandD(x)∈{0,1}\mathrm{Stand}_D(x)\in\{0,1\}StandD(x)∈{0,1} while residual coherence is: role-indexed; gradable; non-standing; dependent on pre-break role ancestry. Standing does not weaken. Standing is broken. What varies afterward is the amount and kind of residual organization. Residual Coherence Residual coherence names the non-standing persistence of formerly governed role organization. The paper distinguishes residual forms of: skin; tensor-like load; metricity; measurement; matter-energy; mass and inertia; time; causality; information-like patterning. Skin has weakest residual support. Tensor-like load may persist more robustly. Metricity, measurement, matter-energy, time, and causality retain full role licensing only if governance or certificate structure is supplied. Metricity and Measurement The paper preserves local AASC-GR compatibility. It does not claim that: the Einstein projection fails locally at the horizon; infalling observers experience a particular discontinuity; matter is annihilated at crossing; metric notation becomes unwritable. Instead, it distinguishes: local metric continuation; standing-bearing metric role; measurement standing; residual metrological coherence. Metric writability is not measurement standing. Horizon Is Not an AMetric Reset A black-hole horizon is downstream of: metric comparison; causal typing; exterior/interior role structure; standing-governed reconstruction. Therefore, it cannot license the governance conditions it presupposes. If the horizon is treated as a new admissibility-generating boundary, the theory has declared a new scope or certificate. Mergers and No-Fusion The paper also clarifies the merger case. Exterior black-hole mergers are metric/source processes. Residual contents may become co-classified relative to the merged exterior quotient. But AMetric endpoint tokens do not: collide; touch; fuse; join; transport; compose. Realized interiors collide only inside a shared realized-governance domain. Scope and Nonclaims The paper does not claim to: deny general relativity; solve black-hole interior dynamics; predict infalling experience; identify quantum-gravity microdynamics; claim the interior is absolute nothingness; make the AMetric endpoint conclusion by itself. Role in the Arc This paper exports: the standingless interior classification; residual coherence; governance-depth; residual metric-support thinning; the distinction between residual metric description and endpoint AMetric exposure. These results prepare Paper III’s endpoint exposure and homology theorem. This paper is downstream of: Non-Degenerate Construction and the Kernel of Admissibility  The Structure of Admissibility