Current published reading edition · 2026-06-13
The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Endpoint by Exclusion of Analytic-Arithmetic Mismatch
Amos Jay Maley · 54 pages
This record contains the AASC endpoint-closure manuscript for the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer rank endpoint, together with the associated Lean 4 audit-facing project materials.
From the author's publisher description.
About this paper and citation
Amos Jay Maley. The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Endpoint by Exclusion of Analytic-Arithmetic Mismatch. 2026-06-13. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20673807.
SHA256 e2b4878e0a7b076217fab55fc1a6cfcfc57cabcb12d2801c07a648195fee915e
These searchable PDF bytes match the exact publisher release. The PDF retains the equations, theorem numbering and references. A complete manuscript HTML conversion has not been verified.
Edition metadata
Work DOI record · Publisher metadata
Complete publisher description
Overview
This record contains the AASC endpoint-closure manuscript for the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer rank endpoint, together with the associated Lean 4 audit-facing project materials.
The manuscript treats the BSD rank statement on the fixed elliptic-curve carrier. The proof route is not a conventional arithmetic-geometric construction by descent, Euler systems, Iwasawa theory, rational-point construction, Sha-finiteness proof, or analytic estimation. It is a kernel-first AASC endpoint proof.
Main Claim Boundary
The main closed endpoint is the BSD rank endpoint:
analytic rank equals Mordell-Weil rank for every elliptic curve over (\mathbb{Q}).
The refined leading-coefficient formula is treated separately and conditionally at the standing-fixed formula-factor layer. In particular, the manuscript does not claim to supply an independent arithmetic proof of finite-order standing for the Tate-Shafarevich group. The refined formula closure is located at the explicit factor-standing boundary.
Proof Route
The argument proceeds by fixed-carrier exclusion of analytic-arithmetic mismatch.
Once the official BSD rank endpoint is used as a determinate theorem-bearing target, the fixed carrier already requires the kernel roles of:
reference;
standing;
admissibility;
irreversibility.
Within that non-degenerate endpoint regime, analytic-arithmetic rank mismatch is routed through:
standard BSD mismatch normal form;
bridge-image exclusion;
theorem-level endpoint-status governance;
independent same-domain rank discrimination;
kernel-forced no-second-classifier closure.
The mismatch branch is thereby excluded, yielding pointwise equality between analytic rank and Mordell-Weil rank, and hence the official BSD rank endpoint correspondence.
Lean 4 Audit Layer
The accompanying Lean 4 material is an audit and reproducibility layer for the theorem-routing surface of the manuscript.
It formalizes the proof-route architecture, including:
endpoint-use structure;
carrier adequacy predicates;
rank-mismatch normal form;
bridge-image exclusion;
endpoint-governance routing;
no-fifth-case closure;
no-independent-discriminator closeout;
official rank endpoint correspondence.
The Lean 4 archive is not presented as a full formalization of elliptic curves, modularity, analytic continuation, Mordell-Weil theory, regulators, Tamagawa factors, or Sha from first principles. Its role is to audit the theorem-routing surface of the AASC endpoint proof.
Associated Resources
Lean 4 audit archive: https://github.com/somamaley-ux/AASC-BSD-Endpoint-Lean-Audit
Zenodo record for the Lean 4 audit archive: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20619017
Author description for the selected public release. Text formatting may differ from the publisher display. This is descriptive metadata, not a manuscript conversion or independent proof verification.
A preferred reading edition does not replace an exact edition imported by a downstream theorem.