Current published reading edition · 2026-05-11
Realized Persistence Cannot Be Physically Null
Amos Jay Maley · 29 pages · Realized Physics Arc - Paper 1
The manuscript argues that, within a fixed admissible regime, minimally realized standing-bearing persistence requires non-identical continuation-sensitive reconstruction classes. This non-null interior is a role-equivalence class, not a selected substance, geometry, field or particle.
Repository reading summary based on the selected manuscript.
About this paper and citation
Amos Jay Maley. Realized Persistence Cannot Be Physically Null. 2026-05-11. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20119796.
SHA256 983baf12f3adc2c0cea18a61c2ea80ca943a613244512df01bc467cdf07ece90
Edition metadata · Work DOI · Exact publisher metadata
The summary was checked against the abstract, named sections and conclusion of this exact release. Completion markers were reviewed; the manuscript claims have not been independently verified. Equations, theorem numbering and full references are preserved in the original searchable PDF. This page is a reading aid, not a full-text conversion.
Source references
- Section 3: Imported AASC roles · PDF page 8
- Section 4: Reconstruction Non-Vacuity, Theorem 4.14 · PDF page 13
- Section 6: Minimal Persistence Interior and pre-metric limits · PDF page 17
- Section 13: Conclusion · PDF page 25
The named realized-physics imports are recorded by the manuscript. Their exact frozen source editions are not fully pinned in its references. Links below open current reading editions and do not establish which bytes were imported.
Realized physics reading order
The selected manuscripts identify this order. These links open current reading editions; the manuscripts do not pin all imported sources to exact release bytes.