Current published reading edition · 2026-05-05
Renormalization Invariance and Standing Preservation in the Non-Predictivity of Zero-Point Vacuum Energy
Amos Jay Maley · 8 pages · Vacuum-energy invariance companion
The manuscript supplies a local correspondence theorem: in the specified homogeneous metric-proportional vacuum sector, standing preservation and descent to the QFT renormalization quotient select the same scalar assignments. The equivalence is conditional on its defined binding and transformation class. It preserves empirical boundary input, Casimir and phase differences, and the unresolved effective cosmological-constant problem. It neither derives QFT from AASC nor extends this classification to every curved-spacetime stress-tensor contribution.
Repository reading summary based on the selected manuscript.
About this paper and citation
Amos Jay Maley. Renormalization Invariance and Standing Preservation in the Non-Predictivity of Zero-Point Vacuum Energy. 2026-05-05. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20044420.
SHA256 8db4bb63615af18c7ec1cc0443d131e0776bb56d27a1a102ebea5a27725098d8
Edition metadata · Work DOI · Exact publisher metadata
The summary was checked against the abstract, named sections and conclusion of this exact release. Completion markers were reviewed; the manuscript claims have not been independently verified. Equations, theorem numbering and full references are preserved in the original searchable PDF. This page is a reading aid, not a full-text conversion.
Source references
- Section 2: QFT quotient and scope · PDF page 2
- Section 4: Binding correspondence and Proposition 1 · PDF page 4
- Section 5: Renormalization invariance-standing equivalence, Theorem 1 · PDF page 5
- Section 7: Bridge limits and unresolved naturalness · PDF page 7
The named imports are recorded by the manuscript. Their exact frozen source editions are not fully pinned in its references. Links below open current reading editions and do not establish which bytes were imported.
Vacuum-energy companion reading order
This is a suggested reading order. Each theorem retains its stated target and additional premises. It is not an assertion that every listed work logically imports every preceding work. Links open current reading editions; exact imported source bytes remain unresolved where references do not pin an edition.